I work for the Library of Michigan.
In this blog I've maintained somewhat of an "arms-length" relationship with my my employer. The nature of this relationship is my decision based on an "incident" early in this blog's life. I don't hide who I work for, but I also don't know that I've ever named my employer by name - before now.
I mention this because the Library of Michigan is currently part of the Department of History, Arts, and Libraries (HAL). Lately, there has been a bit of buzz on the blogoworld and twittersphere about HAL because the Governor's Executive Order 2009-36 abolishes this department. The various agencies of the department are being moved into other existing departments with the Library going under Education and the Archives going under Dept. of Natural Resources!? This is an effort at "streamlining" government and saving money.
Unfortunately, shifting around agencies to save on administrative costs isn't where the EO ends for the Library. The Order advises ending circulation of all collections, and, with the exception of the Law collection, the Order includes the alternative of transfering the collections to another institution. I found this disappointing, but not particularly surprising. The one little detail which left me quite surprised and annoyed was that among the lists of collections which could be transferred to another institution included the Michigan Government Documents, which, together with the archives, is the nearly 200 year legacy of the activity of the government of Michigan.
Part of the pride I take in what I do and where I do it is that I play a role in the whole open government, democratic world. The State makes decisions, takes actions, investigates situations, and through the library the state collects, preserves, and provides access to this work. This is in order for future citizens and legislators to be able to look at and understand past actions and decisions. Preserving the legislative history is part of holding a government accountable for its actions. And so, to give that collection, and the responsiblity to continue collecting the documents of the State away to another institution seems like a dereliction of the duties of state. I don't doubt that a major local university is not capable of the task but that would put a significant gap between those making the decisions today, and the record of past decisions and actions.
But, things may not be as bad as they seem, or at least as some are reporting. I was talking to a colleague this morning and we felt like we are somewhere between "Rumors of our death have been greatly exagerated" and "We're not dead yet!" There are still a lot of discussion to be had and decisions to be made, and nothing in state government happens quickly, but I also don't particularly anticipate that my position will last much longer than a year or two. (Anyone need a preservation-minded librarian, slightly used?)
A Conservation Video from the Getty
1 day ago
